Uterine Preservation in a Young Woman with Pelvic Organ Prolapse: An Interventional Case Report
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is approximately 2 - 20% in women under the age of 45 years. Uterine preservation appears promising for young patients who have not completed childbearing. Sacrohysteropexy is preferred when uterine preservation is desired, with cure rates of 91-100%. This report describes a woman with pelvic organ prolapse who wished to preserve her uterus and underwent abdominal sacrohysteropexy
Case Illustration: A 42-year-old woman, P2A0, presented with a bulging mass following vaginal birth, noted 6 months before admission. She continues to menstruate regularly, and her husband hopes to have another child. On Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) examination, she was diagnosed with 4th grade uterine prolapse, 3rd grade cystocele, and 3rd grade rectocele. She decided to preserve her uterus with abdominal sacrohysteropexy. At one-month follow-up, the patient was satisfied with the procedure and reported no further complaint of mass bulging.
Discussion: Sacrohysteropexy is a promising procedure to preserve the uterus, with success rates of up to 90% at three to five years. Use of mesh may be associated with the risk of infection and mesh erosion into the vagina. Recurrence is usually caused by pelvic floor weakness, with a rate of 16.7% in a local study.
Conclusion: Abdominal sacrohysteropexy is a safe procedure for POP in young women who wish to preserve the uterus, provided it is performed carefully.
Preservasi Uterus pada Prolaps Organ Panggul Wanita Muda: Sebuah Laporan Kasus Intervensi
Abstrak
Pendahuluan: Prevalensi prolaps organ panggul (POP) terjadi sekira 2 - 20% pada wanita di bawah 45 tahun. Konservasi uterus tampak menjanjikan pada pasien usia muda dan masih menginginkan anak. Sakro histeropeksi menjadi salah satu pilihan, preservasi uterus dapat mencapai 91-100%. Kasus ini melaporkan terapi konservasi uterus pada wanita POP yang masih muda dengan keinginan untuk memiliki keturunan melalui operasi sakrohisteropeksi per abdominal.
Ilustrasi Kasus: Seorang wanita 42 tahun, P2A0, datang dengan massa menonjol dari jalan lahir sejak 6 bulan. Dia masih menstruasi dan suaminya masih berharap memiliki anak. Pada pemeriksaan POP-Q didapatkan prolaps uterus derajat 4, sistokel derajat 3, dan rektokel derajat 3. Dia memutuskan konservasi uterus melalui prosedur sakro histeropeksi. Satu bulan setelah prosedur, pasien merasa puas dan tidak ada keluhan lagi.
Diskusi: Sakro histeropeksi merupakan tindakan pembedahan yang menjanjikan dengan angka tidak ada kekambuhan pada tiga sampai lima tahun mencapai 90%. Penggunaan mesh berkaitan dengan risiko infeksi dan keluar mesh dari vagina. Angka rekurensi biasanya disebabkan oleh kelemahan dasar panggul dengan prevalensi 16,7%.
Kesimpulan: Sakro histeropeksi perabdominam merupakan prosedur aman untuk POP wanita muda yang masih menginginkan adanya rahim.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Dhital R, Otsuka K, Poudel KC, Yasuoka J, Dangal G, Jimba M. Improved quality of life after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in Nepalese women. BMC Women’s Health. 2013 May 9;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-22
Akmel M, Segni H. Pelvic organ prolapse in jimma university specialized hospital, southwest ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2012 Jul;22(2):85–92. PMCID: PMC3407830
Kishwara S, Tanira S, Omar E, Begum K. Genital Prolapse in Women of Reproductive Age Group in a Rural Community of Bangladesh. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2010 Jan 1;19(2):118–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/jdmc.v19i2.7082
Khan A, Jaleel R, Nasrullah FD. Sacrohysteropexy performed as uterus conserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: Review of case files. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(5):1174–8. doi: 10.12669/pjms.325.10307
Ridgeway B, Frick AC, Walter MD. Hysteropexy. A review. Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Dec;60(6):509–28. PMID: 18981978
Elneil S, Cutner AS, Remy M, Leather AT, Toozs-Hobson P, Wise B. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse without burial of mesh: a case series. BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):486–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00426.x.
Moiety FMS, Hegab HM, Ghanem IAL, Zedan WM, Salem HAF. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective study on 33 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Apr;281(4):631–6. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1146-5
Kow N, Goldman HB, Ridgeway B. Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation. Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Oct;14(5):395–402. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0336-7.
Price N, Slack A, Jackson SR. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):62–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02617.x.
Moorman PG, Myers ER, Schildkraut JM, Iversen ES, Wang F, Warren N. Effect of hysterectomy with ovarian preservation on ovarian function. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;118(6):1271–9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236fd12.
Frick AC, Barber MD, Paraiso MFR, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Walters MD. Attitudes toward hysterectomy in women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19(2):103–9. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31827d8667
Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Somunkiran A, Doyran GD, Alhan A, Gul B. Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: results of 20 cases. J Reprod Med. 2006 Jul;51(7):539–43. PMID: 16913544
de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, Withagen MIJ, Vierhout ME. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester) versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Nov;20(11):1313–9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0945-3.
Api M, Kayatas S, Boza A, Nazik H, Aytan H. Laparoscopic sacral uteropexy with cravat technique--experience and results. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40(4):526–32. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.12
Uterine Preservation Surgery for Prolapse [Internet]. Your Pelvic Floor. [cited 2024 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.yourpelvicfloor.org/conditions/uterine-preservation-surgery-for-prolapse/
Samantray SR, Mohapatra I. Successful Pregnancy Outcome After Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Cureus. 13(2):e13087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13087.
Albowitz M, Schyrba V, Bolla D, Schöning A, Hornung R. Pregnancy After a Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy: a Case Report. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2014 Oct;74(10):947–9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383032.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/obgynia.v9i2.1097
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_CROSREF22.jpg)








