The Success Rate for Diagnosing Congenital Anomalies During Prenatal

Silva Elifa Firmansyah; Adhi Pribadi; Akhmad Yogi Pramatirta; Anita Rachmawati; Andi Rinaldi

doi:10.24198/obgynia.v7i3.722

The Success Rate for Diagnosing Congenital Anomalies During Prenatal

Silva Elifa Firmansyah, Adhi Pribadi, Akhmad Yogi Pramatirta, Anita Rachmawati, Andi Rinaldi

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the success of prenatal diagnosis in cases of congenital abnormalities at RSHS Bandung.
Methods: This study was descriptive and cross-sectional. We collected data from all neonatal patients with congenital abnormalities who received prenatal care at RSHS Bandung between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2023. Data processing used Microsoft Excel 16.66.1 and IBM SPSS Statistics.
Result: The results show that 59 patients, or 93.6%, had appropriate abnormalities diagnosed, while only 4 patients, or 6.3%, had inappropriate abnormalities.
Conclusion: Prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities showed a fairly high concordance value, namely 93.6%.

Tingkat Keberhasilan Penegakan Diagnosis Kelainan Kongenital pada saat Prenatal

Abstrak
Tujuan: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui keberhasilan diagnosis prenatal pada kasus kelainan kongenital di RSHS Bandung.
Metode: Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif cross-sectional. Data diperoleh dari seluruh pasien neonatal yang disertai kelainan kongenital pada saat prenatal di RSHS Bandung 1 Januari 2021 – 31 Desember 2023. Pengolahan data menggunakan Microsoft Excel 16.66.1 dan IBM SPSS Statistics.
Hasil: Hasil yang didapatkan yaitu akurasi pasien terdiagnosis sesuai ada kelainan sebanyak 59 atau sebesar 93.6% dan terdiagnosis tidak sesuai ada kelainan sebanyak 4 atau sebesar 6.3%.
Kesimpulan: Penegakan diagnosis kelainan kongenital pada saat prenatal menunjukkan nilai kesesuaian yang cukup tinggi, yaitu sebesar 93,6%.

Kata kunci: Prenatal, kelanan kongenital,

Keywords

diagnosis, congenital malformations, accuracy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ayu Murtini NK, Kompiang Sriasih NG, Suarniti NW. Gambaran Karakteristik Ibu Dengan Bayi Yang Mengalami Kelainan Kongenital Di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Sanglah Denpasar Tahun 2020. J Ilm Kebidanan (The J Midwifery). 2021;9(2):116–22.

Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Hari Kelainan Bawaan Sedunia. Perpust Kementeri Kesehat RI. 2023;

Kemenkes RI. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2021. Pusdatin.Kemenkes.Go.Id. 2022. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.

Monier I, Lelong N, Benachi A, Jouannic JM, Khoshnood B, Zeitlin J. Postnatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies despite active systematic prenatal screening policies: a population-based registry study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023;5(11):101170.

Paripurna Y, Arev Sukarsa MR, Husni Syam H, Sasotya RMS, Pribadi A, Aziz MA, et al. Validasi Ultrasonografi Transabdominal pada Luaran Kelainan Kongenital Janin di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung Tahun 2018. Indones J Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;3(2):135–42.

Amani FZ, P WM, I CN, A AR, E GK, I AM, et al. Clinical Characteristic of Congenital Fetal Anomaly In Tertiary Referral Hospital in East Java, Indonesia. Int Islam Med J. 2021;2(2):40–6.

Novi NER, Aryanti D, Triguna Y. Analisis Usia Gestasi Ibu Melahirkan dengan Berat badan Bayi Baru Lahir di Rumah Sakit. Media Inf. 2022;18(2):67–72.

Putra RA. Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies on Routine Ultrasound Examination of Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy in Cikalong Wetan Hospital Prevalensi Kelainan Kongenital Janin saat Ultrasonografi Rutin pada Trimster Dua dan Tiga Kehamilan di RSUD Cikalong. 2018;44–9.

A LE, B LH. Seminar Kedokteran Janin & Neonatal Skrining trimester pertama dan kedua untuk anomali struktural janin. 2017;7:1–10.

Sarjani S, Dewi TP. Keterlambatan Deteksi Dini Pada Conjoined Twin. J Kedokt Syiah Kuala. 2021;21(3):291–7.

Fernandez VR, Lopez C, Ortiz EM, Nerea A. Diagnosis Akurat Hipospadia Berat Menggunakan USG 2D dan 3D. 2016;2016.

Di Prima FAF, Bellia A, Inclimona G, Grasso F, Teresa M, Cassaro MN. Antenatally diagnosed congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations (CCAM): Research Review. J Prenat Med. 2012;6(2):22–30.

Shrestha S, Dwa Y, Jaiswal P, Parmar B. Congenital anomalies in antenatal ultrasound scan at a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Patan Acad Heal Sci. 2018;5(1):26–30.

Ameen SK, Alalaf SK, Shabila NP. Pattern of congenital anomalies at birth and their correlations with maternal characteristics in the maternity teaching hospital, Erbil city, Iraq. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 18;18(1):501.

Munim S, Nadeem S, Ali Khuwaja N. The accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56(1):16–8.

Mose JC. Aspek Etik pada Pemeriksaan USG Obstetri. Bagian Obstet dan Ginekol Fak Kedokt Univ Padjajaran/RS Dr Hasan Sadikin Bandung. 2008;32(2).

Durković J, Ubavić M, Durković M, Kis T. Prenatal screening markers for down syndrome: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative expected value method. J Med Biochem. 2018;37(1):62–6.

Galani A, Zikopoulos A, Papandreou L, Mastora E, Zikopoulos K, Makrydimas G. Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Jejunal Atresia: A Case Report. Cureus. 2021;13(10):1–5.

Hamrick SEG, Sallmon H, Rose AT, Porras D, Shelton EL, Reese J, et al. Patent ductus arteriosus of the preterm infant. Pediatrics. 2020;146(5).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24198/obgynia.v7i3.722